<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. Clean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electricar.us/blog1/index.php/2008/06/19/mr-clean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electricar.us/blog1/2008/06/19/mr-clean/</link>
	<description>Ed Begley Jr. Would Be Proud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://electricar.us/blog1/2008/06/19/mr-clean/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricar.us/blog1/2008/06/19/mr-clean/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hi Bryan:

Many thanks for reading the blog.  It&#039;s nice to know that someone is getting something out of this!

I&#039;ve been following the discussion on lithium batteries for some time now in the electric vehicle (EV) discussion list and have decided against it for several reasons.  As you mentioned, the up-front cost is very high.  While it might be possible to amortize this cost over more years, it&#039;s not a risk that I&#039;m willing to undertake right now.  Rebuilding the car is tough enough.  Rebuilding it with experimental technology would take even longer.  My main goal right now is to get the car up and running.  Using lead-acid &quot;floodies&quot; will allow me to do this as quickly as possible.  That said, once the car is running reliably, I&#039;ll certainly have my radar up for battery technologies that would improve the car&#039;s performance.  As I&#039;ll probably have to change the batteries every 2-3 years, it shouldn&#039;t be hard to upgrade to a better battery technology when they become more readily available and cost effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan:</p>
<p>Many thanks for reading the blog.  It&#8217;s nice to know that someone is getting something out of this!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been following the discussion on lithium batteries for some time now in the electric vehicle (EV) discussion list and have decided against it for several reasons.  As you mentioned, the up-front cost is very high.  While it might be possible to amortize this cost over more years, it&#8217;s not a risk that I&#8217;m willing to undertake right now.  Rebuilding the car is tough enough.  Rebuilding it with experimental technology would take even longer.  My main goal right now is to get the car up and running.  Using lead-acid &#8220;floodies&#8221; will allow me to do this as quickly as possible.  That said, once the car is running reliably, I&#8217;ll certainly have my radar up for battery technologies that would improve the car&#8217;s performance.  As I&#8217;ll probably have to change the batteries every 2-3 years, it shouldn&#8217;t be hard to upgrade to a better battery technology when they become more readily available and cost effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Woodsmall</title>
		<link>http://electricar.us/blog1/2008/06/19/mr-clean/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Woodsmall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricar.us/blog1/2008/06/19/mr-clean/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Just a general note:

Have you considered Lithium batteries?  We tend to think that the reason to use lithium is to get tremendous range without tremendous weight (spending a ton of money to do it).  However, another approach is to get the same range you planned with lead acid, but with far less weight, which will improve performance and efficiency.  There is a lot of discussion of this on diyelectriccar.com.  It looks like the initial cost may be somewhere around 3 or 4 times as much, but they may last about 3 times as long, making it comparable.  It is very complicated, with many issues, but maybe worth considering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a general note:</p>
<p>Have you considered Lithium batteries?  We tend to think that the reason to use lithium is to get tremendous range without tremendous weight (spending a ton of money to do it).  However, another approach is to get the same range you planned with lead acid, but with far less weight, which will improve performance and efficiency.  There is a lot of discussion of this on diyelectriccar.com.  It looks like the initial cost may be somewhere around 3 or 4 times as much, but they may last about 3 times as long, making it comparable.  It is very complicated, with many issues, but maybe worth considering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.527 seconds -->
